Widespread use and resistance to breakdown in the environment have made per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) a major global concern. These synthetic chemicals pose major threats to human health and the environment, especially when they contaminate our drinking water.
In response to mounting evidence, regulatory bodies worldwide are implementing new and more stringent regulations to safeguard our water sources. This article explores the impact of these regulations in protecting our water supply from PFAS contamination.
Understanding PFAS Contamination
PFAS are thousands of synthetic chemicals used in numerous applications, including firefighting foams, non-stick cookware, waterproofing textiles, and stain-resistant coatings. Their distinguishing characteristics, including water and oil repellency and heat resistance, have made them widespread in modern civilization. However, these qualities make PFAS extremely persistent in the environment and resistant to breakdown, resulting in its buildup in water sources.
PFAS contamination of water systems is often caused by a variety of processes, including industrial emissions, firefighting activities, and leaching from consumer items. Once released into the environment, PFAS can migrate through soil and groundwater, posing risks to drinking water sources and ecosystems. Even in low quantities, PFAS has been related to cancer, immune system malfunction, and reproductive problems.
AFFF, for example, is said to be a significant source of PFAS contamination. Off-site migration of PFAS from firefighting sites is a major determinant of environmental risks. A ScienceDirect study notes that PFOS (perfluorooctane sulfonic acid) is these sites’ most significant risk driver. The study states that the risk is more hazardous as even a single fire suppression event can result in long-term PFAS discharges.
This is one reason firefighters are more vulnerable to PFAS-associated health risks like cancers. According to TruLaw, firefighters have filed lawsuits against AFFF manufacturers for these increased risks. They allege that the manufacturers should have warned them about the potential health risks of their products. However, they kept profitability ahead and neglected firefighters’ health.
As these lawsuits grew, they were consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL). The latest AFFF lawsuit update shows that, as of May 2024, 8,061 pending cases were in the MDL. The settlement amount of these cases can vary widely and cover medical expenses, pain and suffering, punitive damages, etc.
Emergence of Stringent Regulations
Recognizing the significant risks posed by PFAS contamination, regulatory agencies worldwide have been taking steps to address this issue comprehensively. In recent years, a significant effort has been made to create and enforce new rules to prevent PFAS exposure.
One important component of these restrictions is the implementation of severe limitations on PFAS concentrations in water sources. Regulatory bodies such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have established maximum contamination limits (MCLs) for several PFAS chemicals in drinking water. These MCLs are based on the latest scientific research and aim to ensure that water supplies remain safe for human consumption.
On April 10, 2024, the EPA established the final MCL for six PFAS chemicals. The updated contamination limits are as follows:
- PFOA: 4.0 parts per trillion (ppt)
- PFOS: 4.0 ppt
- PFHxS: 10 ppt
- PFNA: 10 ppt
- HFPO-DA: 10 ppt
- Mixtures containing multiple PFHxS, PFNA, HFPO-DA, and PFBS: 1 (unitless)
The initial compliance monitoring will begin in 2027 and continue after that, so the public water systems have three years. However, bringing down the presence of PFAS levels in water sources across all public water systems in the US will be challenging. If the MCL levels are unmet, these systems will have until 2029 to implement solutions to reduce PFAS levels.
In addition to setting MCLs, regulatory agencies are implementing measures to monitor and regulate PFAS discharges from industrial facilities. For example, industries that use PFAS in their manufacturing processes may be required to implement pollution prevention measures and treatment technologies. Furthermore, PFAS-containing firefighting foams are being restricted or banned in many jurisdictions to prevent further contamination of water sources.
Impact on Water Treatment
Implementing new and stringent PFAS regulations has significant implications for water treatment facilities tasked with ensuring drinking water quality. A TIME article states that around 6% to 10% of the nation’s public drinking water systems must make changes to comply.
Although EPA will offer technical assistance to facilities that need it, this greatly burdens public drinking water systems. Therefore, President Joe Biden’s administration is rolling out $1 billion in funding to help implement PFAS testing and treatment solutions.
Traditional water treatment technologies, such as filtration and chlorination, are frequently inefficient at eliminating PFAS from water due to its chemical characteristics. As a result, water utilities are investing in sophisticated treatment technologies that are particularly intended to address PFAS pollution.
One such technology gaining traction is granular activated carbon (GAC) filtration, which has shown promise in removing PFAS compounds from water. GAC adsorbs PFAS molecules onto its surface, trapping them as water passes through the filtration system. Additionally, ion exchange resins and advanced oxidation processes are being explored as alternative treatment methods for removing PFAS from water sources.
However, while these treatment technologies effectively reduce PFAS concentrations in water, they have significant operational and cost challenges. The long-term sustainability and affordability of implementing these technologies remain areas of concern for water utilities, particularly smaller systems with limited resources.
Collaborative Efforts and Challenges Ahead
Addressing PFAS contamination requires a collaborative effort involving government agencies, industry stakeholders, and the public. While implementing new regulations is essential in safeguarding our water supply, challenges remain in ensuring compliance and enforcement across all sectors.
Furthermore, PFAS contamination is not limited to individual countries or regions but is a global issue that requires international cooperation and coordination. Therefore, efforts to develop standardized testing methods, share data and best practices, and establish global PFAS regulation guidelines are crucial.
One of the most significant challenges water treatment facilities will face is complying with the new guidelines. However, in the long run, it would be a win-win for all, as it could minimize liability risk. Due to the health problems associated with PFAS, drinking water systems may be held liable if they cannot treat the water appropriately.
However, complying with the established levels will ensure that PFAS exposure to water does not cause severe harm to the citizens. This can potentially reduce the chances of litigation against the public drinking water systems.
Consider a recent example where PFAS manufacturer 3M was sued for the contamination its products caused. According to AP News, 3M has recently settled with various water providers across the US for contaminating water. The company agreed to pay $10.5 billion to $12.5 billion through 2036.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does PFAS enter the environment?
One major source is the manufacturing process, which is where PFAS is produced or used. These substances can be released into the air, water, and soil during the production and processing of goods. Additionally, PFAS are present in many everyday consumer products, and as these products degrade or are discarded, the chemicals can leach into the environment.
What are the health implications of PFAS exposure?
PFAS exposure has been related to several health conditions, including cancer, liver damage, lower fertility, etc. High PFAS exposure may also influence the immune system, decreasing antibody responses to immunizations and other immunological consequences. Several factors, including exposure intensity and duration, individual sensitivity, and general health, determine the risk of PFAS-related health impacts.
How are PFAS regulated?
PFAS regulation varies by area and is a constantly developing topic. Since 2009, the European Union has included some PFAS in the Stockholm Convention to eliminate their usage. The EPA is actively trying to develop enforceable PFAS drinking water guidelines and has acted to prevent exposure from various sources.
In conclusion, the emergence of new and stringent PFAS regulations represents a significant milestone in safeguarding our water supply from contamination. By setting strict limits on PFAS concentrations, regulatory agencies, and water utilities are working together to ensure our drinking water remains safe.
However, the journey to addressing PFAS contamination is far from over. Continued collaboration, research, and innovation are needed to fully overcome the challenges posed by these persistent chemicals. Working together, we can conserve our most valuable resource, water, while ensuring the health and well-being of present and future generations.
Also read –
